I’ve long maintained that class in America is a tricky thing, in part because the American Dream not only precludes but excludes class. In many societies, from the United Kingdom to Nigeria to India, there are class dynamics based on ethnicity, bloodlines, and education as well as on how much money you earn. (How many plotlines can we find in British fiction about down-on-their –luck bluebloods?)

From the Washington Post
America has its own royalty, but less of it with a less robust history and a shorter timeline. We measure our royalty, such as it is, in hundreds of years; Europeans and Asians in thousands.
I bring all this up to frame Mitt Romney’s statements that have gotten him in very hot water. He recently stated: “ I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich. They’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.” Romney made those statements on Wednesday after what must have been a satisfying victory Tuesday against Newt Gingrich in the Florida Primary.
Let’s parse these figures a bit. First of all, it’s doubtful that 90-95 percent of Americans are struggling, unless they measure their personal wealth against Romney’s or other titans of industry. The official poverty rate in our nation is 15 percent. Many more people are genuinely struggling to pay their bills. Yet “struggling” is as much a psychological measure as a financial one. There are people who earn a good living who feel overextended; and people who earn nearly nothing who feel, if not secure, at least at peace.
I met one of the latter recently while giving a speech about trends in the job market. He’d been laid off from a job he’d had for three decades, shortly before retirement age. Although he hadn’t been able to find another job, he told me he was thrifty and had savings that would sustain him. I remember how clearly and proudly he said to me, “I’m a free man.”
On the other hand, there are people who earn incomes at or near the “one percent” – i.e., roughly half a million dollars a year in income – and still feel like they’re struggling. In some cases, it’s not all a case of income envy. Our relative sense of wealth is based in part on regionalized and circumstantial expenses. If you earn a half a million dollars a year; have three kids in college who don’t qualify for financial aid; and are also supporting aging parents then perhaps you might feel a sense of anxiety. That’s not government cheese-level stress, but it’s stress nonetheless.
All that said, it’s hard to believe that 90+ percent of Americans perceive themselves as struggling, let alone actually show economic signs of struggling despite their incomes and savings. Anyone who watches television sees endless ads urging the spending of discretionary income on everything from diamond rings to Florida vacations to food at Olive Garden or Red Lobster. That implies that some people, and not just 5 to 10 percent of people, have discretionary incomes or lines of credit they use for non-essentials.
The United States is fundamentally a consumer economy (i.e., roughly 70 percent of GDP, though that number is contested by various economists for various reasons). To crib from artist Barbara Kruger, we shop therefore we are.
.jpg)
There will likely be entire dissertations written on Mitt Romney’s attempts to appeal to a populist voter base. While we consider that proposition, we also have to check in with ourselves, and decide what role we play in our constructions of prosperity, poverty, and class identity.